Free reference list
Core competencies list: 30 behavioural competencies with 240 examples
30 core competencies grouped into leadership, communication, problem-solving, adaptability, customer focus and technical, each with a one-line definition and two behavioural indicators at each of four proficiency levels — 240 examples to use in reviews, role profiles and development plans.
By the CLEAR Talent team
A competency is only useful in a review if two managers would recognise it the same way. “Good communicator” is not something anyone can observe; “structures emails so the main point and any action come first” is. This page is a list of core competencies written in that second way: each one defined in a sentence and broken into behaviours you could actually see someone doing, at four levels of proficiency.
Use it to pick the competencies a role needs, to write the level descriptions for a review form, or to find words for feedback when “meets expectations” says nothing. It is a reference rather than a method — if you are building a framework from scratch, start with the competency framework guide and come back here for the wording. Below the list is a role competency profile template and three profiles built from it.
The list
Core competencies list with behavioural examples
Each competency below has a one-line definition and two behavioural indicators at each of four proficiency levels. Read across a row to see how the same competency grows from someone learning it to someone others learn it from; read down a column to see what one level looks like across competencies.
The four levels are the same for every competency, so a rating means the same thing whichever row it sits in:
- Level 1 — Foundational
- Understands the competency and applies it to routine work with guidance and review.
- Level 2 — Developing
- Applies it independently in familiar situations; needs support when the work is new or ambiguous.
- Level 3 — Proficient
- Applies it independently and consistently, including in unfamiliar situations. Others can rely on the result.
- Level 4 — Advanced
- Handles complex or high-stakes cases, improves how others apply it and coaches them in it.
Leadership competencies
For anyone who leads people or leads work through others. Level 1 and 2 indicators describe the behaviours that come before a leadership role, so the same rows work for aspiring leaders.
| Competency | 1 · Foundational | 2 · Developing | 3 · Proficient | 4 · Advanced |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Setting directionTurns organisational goals into clear priorities that people understand and can act on. |
|
|
|
|
| Coaching and developing othersHelps other people build capability through feedback, questions and stretch opportunities. |
|
|
|
|
| Decision-makingMakes timely, well-reasoned decisions with the information available and owns the outcome. |
|
|
|
|
| Delegation and empowermentHands over work and authority so others can own outcomes, with the right level of oversight. |
|
|
|
|
| Leading changeHelps people understand, accept and adopt changes to how work is done. |
|
|
|
|
Communication competencies
How people share information, listen and work with each other. These are the competencies most often named as core, because every role depends on them.
| Competency | 1 · Foundational | 2 · Developing | 3 · Proficient | 4 · Advanced |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Written communicationWrites clearly and concisely for the reader, so the message is understood the first time. |
|
|
|
|
| Verbal communication and presentingExplains ideas clearly in conversation and in presentations, adjusting to the audience. |
|
|
|
|
| Active listeningGives full attention, checks understanding and responds to what was actually said. |
|
|
|
|
| Giving and receiving feedbackGives specific, constructive feedback and responds to feedback on their own work without defensiveness. |
|
|
|
|
| Collaboration and teamworkWorks with others towards shared goals, sharing information, effort and credit. |
|
|
|
|
Problem-solving competencies
How people analyse situations, make judgements and organise work to get to a result. Most roles need at least one of these at level 3.
| Competency | 1 · Foundational | 2 · Developing | 3 · Proficient | 4 · Advanced |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analytical thinkingBreaks problems into parts, examines the evidence and draws sound conclusions. |
|
|
|
|
| Creativity and innovationGenerates new ideas and finds better ways of doing things. |
|
|
|
|
| JudgementWeighs options, risks and consequences to reach sensible conclusions when information is incomplete. |
|
|
|
|
| Planning and organisingPlans work, sets priorities and manages time and resources to deliver on commitments. |
|
|
|
|
| Attention to detail and qualityProduces accurate, complete work and checks it against the standard required. |
|
|
|
|
Adaptability competencies
How people respond to change, pressure and the unfamiliar. These competencies are hard to see in a calm year, so look for evidence from the busiest or least certain periods.
| Competency | 1 · Foundational | 2 · Developing | 3 · Proficient | 4 · Advanced |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FlexibilityAdjusts approach, priorities and ways of working when circumstances change. |
|
|
|
|
| ResilienceStays effective under pressure and recovers from setbacks. |
|
|
|
|
| Learning agilityLearns quickly from experience and applies what was learned in new situations. |
|
|
|
|
| Handling ambiguityMakes progress when goals, information or roles are unclear. |
|
|
|
|
| Adopting new tools and methodsTakes up new technology, tools and ways of working, and helps others do the same. |
|
|
|
|
Customer focus competencies
How people understand and serve the customers their work exists for. “Customer” includes internal customers: the colleagues, teams, patients or citizens who rely on the work.
| Competency | 1 · Foundational | 2 · Developing | 3 · Proficient | 4 · Advanced |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Understanding customer needsFinds out what customers need and why, not only what they ask for. |
|
|
|
|
| Service deliveryDelivers a reliable, responsive service that meets agreed standards. |
|
|
|
|
| Building customer relationshipsBuilds trust with customers so the relationship lasts beyond a single interaction. |
|
|
|
|
| Handling complaints and difficult situationsResolves complaints fairly and calmly, and learns from them. |
|
|
|
|
| Commercial awarenessUnderstands how the organisation creates value and how their own work contributes to it. |
|
|
|
|
Technical competencies
Technical and professional competencies that apply across roles. Each job family adds its own functional competencies — financial analysis, clinical practice, software engineering — written to the same four levels.
| Competency | 1 · Foundational | 2 · Developing | 3 · Proficient | 4 · Advanced |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Professional and technical expertiseApplies the specialist knowledge and skills the role requires to a high standard. |
|
|
|
|
| Digital literacyUses digital tools and information confidently and safely to get work done. |
|
|
|
|
| Data analysis and useCollects, interprets and uses data to inform decisions. |
|
|
|
|
| Quality, safety and complianceWorks within legal, regulatory and organisational requirements and helps others do the same. |
|
|
|
|
| Process improvementFinds and removes waste, delay and error in how work is done. |
|
|
|
|
Download the full list as a spreadsheet (CSV)
Nothing here is gated: the spreadsheet holds every competency, definition and indicator shown above, one row per competency and one column per level. Edit the wording freely — the list is a starting point, not a standard.
The role competency profile template
Template
Role competency profile
Fill in the profile details once, then one row per competency the role requires. Six to eight rows cover most roles; take the competency names and indicators from the list above and rewrite them in the role’s own language.
| Field | What to write |
|---|---|
| Profile details | |
| Role | Job title, and the team or job family it sits in. |
| Proficiency scale | The levels you will rate against, with what each one means. The four on this page: 1 foundational, 2 developing, 3 proficient, 4 advanced. |
| Assessed by | Who rates the competencies — usually the manager, reconciled with a self-assessment. |
| Evidence sources | Where ratings come from: observed work, outcomes, 360° feedback, customer feedback, work samples. Two sources are better than one. |
| Date agreed | When the profile was agreed, and when it will next be reviewed. |
| For each competency (up to 8) | |
| Competency | Named as your framework names it, or taken from the list above. |
| Category | Leadership, communication, problem-solving, adaptability, customer focus or technical. |
| Required level | 1 to 4: the level the role needs, set from the role rather than from whoever holds it today. |
| What it looks like in this role | One or two indicators at the required level, rewritten with the role’s own situations, so a manager can recognise them. |
| Evidence to look for | The specific work, feedback or outcome that would show the level has been reached. |
As a spreadsheet
One row per competency. Copy the grid below and paste it into the first cell of a spreadsheet, or download the CSV.
| # | Competency | Category | Required level | What it looks like in this role | Evidence to look for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | |||||
| 2 | |||||
| 3 | |||||
| 4 | |||||
| 5 | |||||
| 6 | |||||
| 7 | |||||
| 8 |
Show the plain-text template
ROLE COMPETENCY PROFILE Role: Proficiency scale: Assessed by: Evidence sources: Date agreed: COMPETENCY 1 Competency: Category: Required level: What it looks like in this role: Evidence to look for: COMPETENCY 2 Competency: Category: Required level: What it looks like in this role: Evidence to look for: COMPETENCY 3 Competency: Category: Required level: What it looks like in this role: Evidence to look for: COMPETENCY 4 Competency: Category: Required level: What it looks like in this role: Evidence to look for: COMPETENCY 5 Competency: Category: Required level: What it looks like in this role: Evidence to look for: COMPETENCY 6 Competency: Category: Required level: What it looks like in this role: Evidence to look for: COMPETENCY 7 Competency: Category: Required level: What it looks like in this role: Evidence to look for: COMPETENCY 8 Competency: Category: Required level: What it looks like in this role: Evidence to look for:
Nothing here is gated: the spreadsheet and the text file hold exactly the fields shown above, with eight blank competency rows.
How to build a role competency profile from this list
The list is deliberately longer than any one role needs. These five steps turn it into a short profile a manager can assess against and an employee can act on.
Start from the role, not the list
Write down the three or four outcomes the role exists to deliver and the situations that make it hard. Then read the list looking for the competencies those outcomes depend on. Starting from the list instead tends to produce a profile that asks for everything and distinguishes nothing.
Pick six to eight competencies across the categories
Most roles need something from communication and problem-solving, and leadership roles need two or three leadership competencies. Keep the total to a number a manager can assess with evidence in one review — usually six to eight. If two competencies would always be rated the same for this role, keep one.
Set the required level for each
Use the four levels on this page. Most experienced roles need level 3, proficient, in their most important competencies; level 4 belongs where the role is expected to raise how others work. Set the level from what the role needs, not from what the current holder can already do.
Rewrite the indicators in the role’s language
The indicators here are generic on purpose. For each competency, rewrite one or two at the required level using the role’s own situations — “resolves most issues at the first contact” becomes “resolves most billing queries on the first call”. That is what lets two managers rate the same behaviour the same way.
Name the evidence, then use the same profile everywhere
For each row, say what evidence would show the level: an outcome, a piece of work, feedback from colleagues or customers. Then use the same profile for the review form, 360° questions and the development plan, so a gap found in one shows up in the others.
Competency examples for performance reviews: three role profiles
Three profiles built from the list, each with its required levels and the indicators rewritten for the role. Notice how few competencies each one uses, and that the required level is not the same everywhere.
These profiles were written for this page to show a workable level of detail. They do not describe real employees, roles at a real organisation or any CLEAR Talent customer.
Customer service team leader
Example 1: a customer service team leader
Leads a team of eight advisers handling phone and email queries. The role is measured on resolution and customer satisfaction, and the leader spends a large part of the week coaching advisers on live cases.
- Proficiency scale
- The four levels on this page
- Assessed by
- Contact centre manager, reconciled with a self-assessment
- Evidence sources
- Call reviews, quality scores, customer feedback and upward feedback from the team
| Competency | Category | Required level | What it looks like in this role | Evidence to look for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coaching and developing others | Leadership | 3 | Reviews a sample of each adviser’s calls every month and agrees one thing to work on, starting from the adviser’s own view of the call. | Monthly call-review notes; improvement in each adviser’s quality scores over the period; upward feedback. |
| Handling complaints and difficult situations | Customer focus | 3 | Takes escalated calls, agrees a fair outcome within policy, and logs the cause so repeat complaints can be traced. | Escalation log; complaint outcomes upheld on review; repeat complaints referred for a process fix. |
| Resilience | Adaptability | 3 | Keeps the team focused and the queue moving during peak periods, and notices when an adviser needs a break after a difficult call. | Performance during the two busiest weeks of the period; team feedback; absence and well-being conversations recorded. |
| Planning and organising | Problem-solving | 2 | Plans the weekly rota against forecast demand and adjusts it when demand changes. | Service levels against forecast; rota changes made ahead of known peaks. |
| Data analysis and use | Technical | 2 | Reads the weekly queue and satisfaction reports and explains to the team what changed and why. | Weekly team briefings that refer to the data; one improvement suggested from it. |
Software engineer
Example 2: a mid-level software engineer
A software engineer on a product team, working mostly independently on features and taking part in design and code review. The profile is weighted towards technical and problem-solving competencies, with collaboration at the level the team relies on.
- Proficiency scale
- The four levels on this page
- Assessed by
- Engineering manager, with input from the tech lead
- Evidence sources
- Delivered work, design documents, code reviews and peer feedback
| Competency | Category | Required level | What it looks like in this role | Evidence to look for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Professional and technical expertise | Technical | 3 | Delivers features end to end without close review, and is the person the team asks about the parts of the system they own. | Features shipped in the period; questions routed to them; quality of their code-review comments. |
| Analytical thinking | Problem-solving | 3 | Investigates production issues to the root cause and writes up what happened, why and what will stop it happening again. | Incident write-ups; repeat incidents in their area. |
| Collaboration and teamwork | Communication | 3 | Works with product and design on the shape of a feature before building it, and resolves disagreements by going back to the user problem. | Peer feedback from product and design; design documents with agreed decisions recorded. |
| Written communication | Communication | 2 | Writes design documents and pull-request descriptions that state the decision and the reason first. | Two design documents reviewed by the tech lead. |
| Adopting new tools and methods | Adaptability | 3 | Evaluates a new library or tool for the team, pilots it on one feature and recommends whether to adopt it. | Pilot write-up and the team’s decision. |
HR adviser
Example 3: an HR adviser
An HR adviser supporting managers in two business areas with policy questions, employee relations cases and people reporting. Accuracy and judgement matter more than speed, so compliance and judgement carry the highest required levels.
- Proficiency scale
- The four levels on this page
- Assessed by
- HR manager, reconciled with a self-assessment
- Evidence sources
- Case files, manager feedback, report accuracy and audit findings
| Competency | Category | Required level | What it looks like in this role | Evidence to look for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quality, safety and compliance | Technical | 3 | Advises managers on policy and employment law requirements correctly, and checks that each case follows the procedure. | Case audits with no procedural issues; manager feedback on the advice. |
| Judgement | Problem-solving | 3 | Knows when a case can be resolved informally and when it needs a formal process, and explains the trade-off to the manager. | Case outcomes; cases escalated at the right point. |
| Active listening | Communication | 3 | In difficult conversations, summarises what the employee has said fairly before responding, and picks up concerns that were not stated directly. | Meeting notes reviewed by the HR manager; employee feedback where it is gathered. |
| Data analysis and use | Technical | 2 | Produces the quarterly absence and turnover reports for both areas and explains the main movements to each management team. | Report accuracy; questions from managers answered without rework. |
| Understanding customer needs | Customer focus | 2 | Identifies what a manager is trying to achieve behind a policy question, and answers that as well as the question asked. | Manager feedback; repeat questions on the same issue falling. |
From list to library
Using a competency library consistently in CLEAR Talent
A list like this helps you write a profile. Applying it the same way across every team and every review cycle is the harder part, and it is what competency management software is for. In CLEAR Talent you define each competency once in a central library — with behavioural anchors at each proficiency level and the evidence a rating needs — and reuse it across reviews, 360° feedback and development plans. Scales are configurable from three to seven levels, and technical, leadership and individual-contributor roles can each have their own.
Each role profile carries its required competencies and target levels. Starter libraries are provided and fully editable, and Ava, the platform’s AI assistant, can draft a role-specific framework from your role and organisation context; your team edits and approves it before it is used, every AI output is labelled and editable, and every edit is logged.
Ratings are evidence-based, so gaps come from the assessments themselves rather than from impressions. Dashboards show capability coverage by individual, team, department and competency, and each assessment drafts an individual development plan from the competencies that matter most for the role, ranked by the size of the gap.