Skip to main content
Free tool

Performance review and 360° feedback question generator

Pick a competency, the kind of role and the type of review. You get three behaviours to rate, three open questions and three comment stems, written for that combination — ready to copy into your own review form. No sign-up.

Delivers their own work and has no direct reports.

Your question set

Communication · Individual contributor · Self-assessment

Sharing information clearly, listening well and adapting the message to the audience.

Behaviours to rate

Rate how consistently you do each of these on your organisation’s scale, and note one example behind each rating.

  1. Writes updates a colleague can act on without a follow-up question.
  2. Listens to understand before responding, and checks what they heard.
  3. Raises concerns early and directly rather than letting them build.

Open questions

  1. Which piece of work this period best shows your communication? Point to the evidence, such as a written update, a handover or a meeting.
  2. Where did your communication fall short of the standard you set yourself, and what would you do differently?
  3. What one change to your communication would make the biggest difference to your work next period?

Comment stems

  • My communication was strongest this period when I …
  • The evidence for this is …
  • To strengthen my communication next period, I will …

Copying needs no details. For the PDF, leave your name and email on the next page and a real person will send it, typically within one business day.

Show the set as plain text
Communication · Individual contributor · Self-assessment
Sharing information clearly, listening well and adapting the message to the audience.

Behaviours to rate
Rate how consistently you do each of these on your organisation’s scale, and note one example behind each rating.
1. Writes updates a colleague can act on without a follow-up question.
2. Listens to understand before responding, and checks what they heard.
3. Raises concerns early and directly rather than letting them build.

Open questions
1. Which piece of work this period best shows your communication? Point to the evidence, such as a written update, a handover or a meeting.
2. Where did your communication fall short of the standard you set yourself, and what would you do differently?
3. What one change to your communication would make the biggest difference to your work next period?

Comment stems
- My communication was strongest this period when I …
- The evidence for this is …
- To strengthen my communication next period, I will …

Generated with the free CLEAR Talent review question generator: https://www.clear-talent.com/tools/performance-review-generator

How to use it

Questions that produce evidence, not adjectives.

The generator follows the same approach as CLEAR Talent’s Competency Assessment Framework: observable behaviours, role-specific expectations and an example behind every rating.

  1. Step 1

    Choose what the review has to assess

    Pick one competency per set. A review that asks about six competencies in one sitting gets six shallow answers; two or three, asked well, produce evidence a manager can use.

  2. Step 2

    Match the role and the review type

    The behaviours change with the role, because good communication from an engineer does not look like good communication from a team lead. The questions and stems change with the review type, because a self-assessment, a manager’s judgement and a peer’s observation answer different questions.

  3. Step 3

    Ask for an example behind every rating

    A rating with no example is an opinion. Ask raters to name the piece of work behind each score, so the review conversation is about what happened rather than about the number.

  4. Step 4

    Finish the comment stems, then edit them

    The stems are there to get written feedback started. Replace each ellipsis with a specific observation, and delete any stem that does not fit what you actually saw.

These questions are starter copy written by the CLEAR Talent team, not a validated assessment. To run them at scale — one competency library feeding every review, 360° and development plan — see competency management in CLEAR Talent.

Questions

About the question generator.

What it is, where the wording comes from and how to use it with the scale you already have.

Is the review question generator free?
Yes. It runs in your browser with no sign-up, and you can copy any question set straight into your own review form, survey tool or spreadsheet. Asking for a PDF copy by email is optional.
Where do the questions come from?
They follow the structure of CLEAR Talent’s Competency Assessment Framework: each competency is described as observable behaviours rather than adjectives, the behaviours differ for individual contributors, technical specialists and people managers, and every rating is meant to be backed by evidence. The wording is starter copy written by the CLEAR Talent team, so adapt it to your own competency framework.
Which rating scale should I use with the behaviour statements?
The scale your organisation already uses. Each statement works with a frequency scale, from “rarely” to “consistently”, or with a proficiency scale. In CLEAR Talent, rating scales are configurable from three to seven levels.
Can I use the same behaviours for self-assessment, manager review and 360 feedback?
Yes, and it is deliberate that the behaviour statements stay the same across all three. When the employee, the manager and peers rate the same behaviours, the gaps between their views are what the review conversation should be about. The open questions and comment stems change with the review type.
How does this work inside CLEAR Talent?
In CLEAR Talent you define each competency once in a central library, with behavioural anchors and proficiency levels, and it flows into reviews, 360° feedback and development plans. Competency gaps from an assessment feed directly into Individual Development Plans.

Run every review from one competency library.

See how CLEAR Talent turns a competency framework into reviews, 360° feedback and development plans — with behavioural anchors, proficiency levels and evidence behind every rating.

A real person replies · No obligation